Who Might Benefit


There is no reason it wouldn't help four potential audiences:

  • Speakers of unwritten languages.

    This provides plenty of symbolic resources and hints to create your own writing system for your own unwritten language.

    3/7 of the 7000+ languages of the world are unwritten. Shall we wait for 3000 master's degree theses to be written, with grammar, dictionary, and elementary school curriculum, and for 3000 school teachers to be trained and paid to live in those often remote places to bring literacy to everyone? It's not happening in Nepal, where 64 languages are unwritten despite their constitution which asserts the basic human right of children to be taught in a language they understand. More resources would be better, but let's also not leave everyone ignored while we do have something in our hands that could give them a chance to acquire literacy, by creating it themselves in the language they themselves speak, using the International Phonetic Alphabet. The IPA has been designed to, and surely does, cover nearly all if not all the distinctions their spoken language may require to be written.

  • Illiterate speakers of written languages.

    Learning IPA takes away most of the difficulty, achieved with the greatest of ease, in learning every script. So:

    Learn IPA first!

    Just ask the Chinese who teach their children a Roman-style alphabet, Pinyin, before teaching them non-phonetic ideographic characters.

  • Hence, not just illiterate adults, but also:

  • Children who haven't learned their letters yet.

    An experiment is ongoing to discover whether the instrument may help even prelinguistic (babbling stage, three-year-old) children. If they are practicing their segmental phonetics, why wouldn't they be able to learn the sound-symbol correspondence directly, with zero vocabulary? This is not certain, but it is possible, even likely, and could help to create super-literate, genius children -- or undersocialized, because phonetically nonconformant, utter introverts who read but don't speak. It is a space to be explored carefully.

  • L1-literate, but L2 non-readers.

    There is a large category of literate speakers/readers/writers of written languages who are blocked by their native-language script knowledge limitations from accessing languages written in other scripts. For example, 80% of signage in Delhi uses the Roman alphabet, incidentally included within the IPA. My own fieldwork suggests perhaps 30% of Delhi residents are completely unfamiliar with Roman letters: they study the paper carefully, holding the paper upside down.

    Yet they eagerly want to learn it. Taxi drivers need to read signage, after all.

    Your thoughts?
    (will not be shared or abused)
    Comment:
                                              Feedback is welcome.
  • Copyright © 2024 Thomas C. Veatch. All rights reserved.
    Created: May 16, 2024