Perhaps nothing! Print it, share it, and if you like please do write me what you did and what was the outcome!
The information is in the instrument today.
But for skeptics, the mere instrument might be insufficient; they may demand further methodology exploration and refinement, experimental validation, and finally rollout. I hope to satisfy such negative nellies, too!
Now, let's look at the human side: who all might be involved in these aspects.
Just because a language is written doesn't mean that its national or local government pays for qualified public school teachers for all the speakers of that language.
In that case self-study materials, along with a script transliteration table to support learning their native-language script, may open the doors of literacy for those people, including integration into the economies compatible with that written language.
Don't worry: People can learn to read multiple scripts!
By "work" I mean, a certain intervention will deliver a certain impact. The intervention must be small enough to be universally deliverable. The impact must be a functional improvement in the lives and capabilities of the recipients. If the intervention is small enough to be affordable to send it everywhere, and the impact is large enough that recipients recieve a functional improvement in their lives and capabilities, then I'll say, it works.
Today it is ready for efficacy experiments first by asking subjects to fill in the blanks on a letter-less copy of each table, second by an online survey to regularize responses. Assuming reasonable frequency of correct guessing (the Tamil online survey found about 75% correct guesses using the first-draft, low-resolution drawings I had made at that time), the next question is, In terms of literacy skills and social impact, how much improvement can we give to recipients for how small an intervention.
Subject testing requires qualification, pre-assessment, intervention, re-contacting, post-assessment.
Potential subjects will not qualify if lacking interest, if already literate, or if not able to be located again for followup.
Each experimental subject needs to be pre-assessed as to reading skills, first by offering a written page upside down to see if they turn it right side up, and second by a challenge to read some range of prompts. I don't propose to assess writing skills, if they can read that's enough for me.
A sequence of interventions from the minimum possible (mere delivery, putting the instrument in their hands) to the minimum required to achieve meaningful impact, which I would define as being able to functionally read some range of sample texts. The sequence should start with the least, and be aimed to finding the least that must be done to produce a life-changing functional impact. At the high end of requirements might be the need to sit with them to explain all the letters, to provide paper and pencil and a quiet place to practice and teacherly instruction. But that is hardly less than providing primary education itself and not much of a win unless the amount of handholding with the instrument should be significantly less than the amount required otherwise.
It is possible that a few rounds of instrument refinement and repeating of experiments may be necessary to establish a sweet spot. My hope is that a single piece of paper, printed on two sides, could be enough to transmit the necessities, but that may be too optimistic; a booklet, perhaps with practice pages and a pen or pencil may be a minimum requirement for practical success; and a hierarchy of levels of explanation may need to be explored, if "take this home to teach your kids to read" is not enough.
I believe perhaps a billion humans could benefit from basic phonetic literacy, from illiterate speakers of any and every written language even in big cities like Delhi where many deny that illteracy occurs, to speakers of unwritten languages in the remotest forests and mountains. Reaching them all will be the job of a social media operation,
For the subset, probably the large majority of such people, who are on the internet with smart phones and computers with audio and video, other resources such as teaching apps and teaching videos will be available on this website; obviously those teaching methods will be superior where tech is available, yet I insist, let's not forget and ignore the hidden and invisible people who still cannot afford the tech, who live far away, untaught, disconnected from modern life. Where nothing else is available, paper delivery is still possible. So let's not forget them.
For illiterate people whose language has a written form.
This will help you too!
With great love and great respect,
Yours,
Tom Veatch