This essay, and I, do not share this response.
My own reaction to distress is thoughtful introspection, by which I
hope to grasp the solid realities of my subjective perspective, to
find stable inner truths that I can rely on and use to defeat
distress. Some would say that spinning the inner wheels is
just that. But I would say that there is more to it than spinning
wheels.
Civilization's motto is Socrates': Know Thyself. By studying yourself
you can hope to gain knowledge, peace, wisdom, and freedom
(eventually). You will have yourself to experience, keep company
with, respect, and love, and knowing that, and doing that by habit (if
not by disposition or temperament) is itself knowledge, peace,
wisdom, and freedom.
Introspection is much maligned by serious, thoughtful people:
scientists, behaviorists, skeptics. I speak to them and to you. It
is not unreasonable: Every day if you look inside you will see
something different. Anger gives way to sadness, joy to peace.
Confusion and understanding take turns. What is constant? What can be
studied and truly understood? What can be said that is true, that
will be true tomorrow, that holds as well for you as it does for me?
Concern for truth, constancy, and communicability are hallmarks of
science and acceptable educated conversation, and introspection would
appear to have little of these. Indeed those goals are mine,
otherwise I wouldn't write this for you.
But the purpose of introspection is the better management of one's own
internal life. Few truly don't care about this, and those that do are
free to wander away. This defense cannot be rejected; our
purpose is valid.
So, you and I talk about shared goals. We start where we are, and we
learn what we can. And if a little of what we discover and try to say
is true, constant, and even communicable, then a sweet surprise that
may be, on our independent path to self-knowledge.
Consider, hypothetically, one definition that might work:
Some things we can experience: sensation and things derived
from sensation such as perceptions and inferences about objects and
events, aspects of language (like sound or meaning), rich mental
constructs for social relations, movement, aspects of emotions
(intensity, attraction/avoidance, social meaning, emotion-derived
plans of action), thought in linguistic and other forms.
Other things we don't experience, though with training perhaps
we could learn to: habituated sensation, things that are not at the
center of attention, other aspects of language (like syntax), alien or
unnoticed social relationships, movement on scales of time and space a
few orders of magnitude away from our body size and attention span,
perhaps other aspects of emotions (their nature as composite
experiences, for example, or the processes of inference that brought
them into experience), and finally, thought without form (if there is
such a thing!).
The thinking, creative part of us is unattached, fast-moving. It does
what understanding we are capable of. Even the sense of weight,
dullness, and attachment is vivified by this. This thing also, it
seems, cannot be sensed directly. This part of us seems not to be the
mind as defined here, but might be understood as that which is behind
the mind, which leaves our active experiences of things behind in its
experience-creating wake.
One should always try to find the proper level of generality to
describe the workings of a phenomenon. So in thinking about my mind,
I wonder if there isn't some maximum point of abstract generalization
about the mind. Generalizing means removing all the particulars,
so to do that in thinking of the mind, means to consider the
mind without any particular content in it. Take all the content out,
and what do you have?
Is there a positive internal representation of nothingness? Is there
some background representation that remains when the media content is
removed from the media player, so to speak?
From the definition above, the answer is No, because it implies that
the mind cannot experience or understand emptiness, or any featureless
purity. If the word "mind" refers to the consciously accessible
experience of things, then if there is nothing being experienced, then
the mind is itself erased and gone.
Consider, is there is a way from the mind to the emptiness beyond the
experienced shell of consciousness. Attempting to experience it a)
fails when trying to experience something (though the attempt
is understandable even in failure: that's the nature of what the mind
does!); or b) empties the mind (and turns out to have washed
simplicity and peace through one's experience).
Bear with me a moment, ye atheists.
(Indeed I too am an atheist: There is NO deliveryman in the sky
responding to or capriciously ignoring our nightly bended-knee
shopping lists; there is NO entity in this real universe referred to
by the name God. Moses did NOT have tape-recordable words spoken to
him in Hebrew by an entity of some or any kind in that burning bush on
the mountain from which he came down with his Commandments. There is
no doubt about this and no reason to doubt it.)
What is "God"? Consider it as a linguistic unit: three letters, three
phonemes, one syllable, morpheme, and word; syntactically it can
either be a common noun or a proper noun; semantically it seems
obscure. But what is the meaning of this morpheme? Suppose that the
word refers to that emptiness of mind, or equivalently to anything
intrinsically beyond our experience, and that the word also
connotes love and goodness. Experiencing the word (that is,
the event where the mind understands the meaning of the word) sets up
the relationship between this mind and that something else (which is
not necessarily anything at all) and constructs in the mind a
representation of something beyond and apart (as by the nature of the
mind the emptiness really is) and perhaps good and perhaps loveable.
For a mind to merge into emptiness, it may be easier to love that
emptiness. And perhaps it may be useful to have a pointer towards
that emptiness in the form of a word which refers to it.
It may be that thinking "God" is a way (not the only way, nor the
best), when you relate to that emptiness, experience it, and become
it, to enter it, to empty the mind, to in the end wash simplicity and
peace and purity through one's experience.
Only a tyrant could say, "Don't go with your feelings!" What else do
we have in life?
But detachment is different things at different ages in life. Early
on, feelings are strong, and detachment is either escape or horrible
death. Later, for me, detachment becomes letting go of stuff I don't
really want anyway, emotions that I'm partly caught up in, partly
confused by, and partly unable and unwanting to really follow through
with.
Noone told me how things would change. Listen: Your experience of
life will change. Perception of smooth continuous movement will
become sparse, frame-to-frame jittery. Clocks will tick faster.
Feelings and intensity will fade. My neighbor asks, Did I notice
that the sun does not shine as brightly?
If you learned to do a thing right, it'll become second nature, not
instantaneous, but very fast, although you won't experience the
details except from far away.
If you don't learn a thing well, you can always try again later, and
usually, knowing more, you can do it better then. But it'll be harder
to be swallowed up in the world of that task. And, if you don't come
back to it, it'll be an incapacity, a lameness, an empty hole in the
world of human possibility for you. So:
Nurture yourself, your innocence, your curiosity, and be as brave as
you can when you are young, it will sustain you later.
Identify with your inspiration, not its products.
Be quick to move; be observant, in order to see where your inspiration
has gone: go with it, now! Run quickly!
Knowledge (which is graspable) excludes inspiration. I can only
follow inspiration around as it jumps from here to there by watching
for its excretions: graspable experience. And by looking
open-mindedly for new one(s), which are unpredictably different. That
form of self, inspiration itself, is probably unknowable in Chomsky's
sense: we don't have the mental apparatus to grasp it.
You are conscious, certainly. Let us start there.
Consciousness has elements of self-awareness, as well as elements
which take the form of other objects of awareness.
Consider the "Self" to be the point where consciousness rests. It is
so named because of the element of self-awareness there; it is
a goal of life because it is a place of rest.
Being pleasure seeking, and ridden by guilt and worry, consciousness
rests more easily in a pleasureable virtue which is secure from
worry (to the extent of its discipline). Rest and discipline don't
conflict -- where the virtuous object of discipline is also
pleasureable.
Consciousness has many forms, so varied and convincing one wonders if
consciousness is unitary. In waking and falling to sleep, this unity,
the similarity of the forms of consciousness, is more approachable
than in the overpowering light of daytime activity. Vision, so
reliable and unwilled. Emotion, coloring our world, definite when in
society, amorphous and ever-changing when internally viewed. Hearing,
so tied to our own sound-making system and to thought, category, and
interpretation. Knowledge, false or true, formed in mysterious shapes
like the objects of knowledge, and based in a conscious focus in that
knowledge. All of these, at low intensities, are so variable,
foolable, intangible, unrepeatable -- as at the boundaries of sleep,
and in the gradual quiet of meditation.
One form of consciousness is in spoken language. Vocalized to others,
one can also speak in one's mind a sentence, a phrase, a word, with or
without vocalization. Simpler is easier, so let's say, a name. The
experience of saying it is as much or more graspable and repeatable as
any conscious experience we have. At will-generated intensities, the
experience of saying the name can itself easily be seen as of the
character of consciousness (as opposed to a more solid form such as
perception of objects in bright light, whose character as consciousness
may be more difficult to grasp).
Oh! variable, foolable experience, how can I grasp you!? How can I
find a virtuous and pleasureable discipline to hold to, to rest in, to
express my love through?! How can I find my Self?
Pick a name or word or phrase which represents what you love, what
gives you peace, or virtue you admire. If it is 'God', or 'goodness',
or 'Mom', or 'Ram', or 'Allah', or 'I love', or -- if you admire
yourself -- your own name, or anything whatever, what matters is the
love, peace, and goodness that YOU associate with it.
Say the Name, sitting quietly and comfortably, with spine straight to
increase your self-awareness. The goal is to grasp something,
repeatably and with discipline and pleasure, to see it as
consciousness, to find a way to rest in it, ultimately to see it as
Self. Say it with energy and enthusiasm, fill yourself with saying
the Name of your love. Throw all you have into it, for as much as you
give, you will receive back. The more you fill up yourself with the
saying of it, the more will you overflow with the ultimate pleasure
and goodness of your own Self.
As with exercise, you can do it longer and easier, or intensely and
briefly, or both. But the greater the exercise, the greater the rest
that comes from it, and the more you practice, the farther you can go.
But the rest is in it, not after it: in continuing the exercise
through the point where the Name starts to become consciousness, to
seem variable and insubstantial, but through discipline, love or
pleasure, through the energy to repeat it in the midst of the melting
away of it, until it and everything melts away, and all that remains
is the disciplined, virtuous rest of featureless consciousness.
Ultimately through practice and discipline, there you will see your
Self, you will rest, self-aware, free.
Consider one experience at a time, analytically in reading this, or
better yet in a time of quiet introspection when you can see it for
yourself: Can a single experience, just one note in the symphony, be
divided into parts?
Of course, we can divide time around an event into before, during and
after, or the event itself into its edges and its middle: beginning,
middle, and ending. Within conscious awareness the experience arises,
is sustained, and subsides.
Although this three-fold division is evident and natural, the
disappearance phase is actually complex and mysterious.
After the content of the experience, whatever it may be, fades from
conscious awareness, there remains a sense of self-awareness, the
simple knowledge of the inner witness that the witness is present. No
actual content of sensation, feeling, or thought is there beyond one's
own simple conscious self-awareness. Do you know this? Can you sit
with yourself and recognize that you are there, watching what's going
on? Of course you can!
When self-consciously watching yourself go through some experience and
it finally is done and gone, for a moment do you not have some
awareness of yourself? Is there not some awareness of the stage on
which your experiences play themselves out, of the center from which
your mental perspective looks out into your world? I have this,
most certainly, it's nothing special, it's basic, fundamental, it's
what you get when you have a brain: self-awareness. For me the pure
form of it is strongest, and unavoidable, during the down time just
after some intense experience; I felt it most strongly as a high
school athlete coming home after practice or after competitions, in a
sense of completion, of satisfaction with myself, of knowing who I am.
This awareness is the Self. It is you. You may wonder sometimes,
What is your purpose in life? The answer is, your purpose in life is
the purpose of your Self, the purpose of your Self is to recognize
yourself, to abide in your self, to be what you are, to have this
self-awareness. It's pretty simple, don't you think? It doesn't need
to be complicated.
We are considering the sequence of phases within an experience; we so
far have a picture in which it first arises, second sustains, and
third subsides into the Self. What next? After the self-awareness
phase there follows a settling-down time, a time of no experience, a
time of the void. Our minds are nothing but activities of our nervous
systems, and after nerves do their active work, they require a time of
refraction, to rest and recharge themselves, to pump enough ions
across their cell membranes so that they can be ready to actively
discharge again, to do the work of carrying out our inner activities,
of sensation, knowledge, action, etc. This fourth phase of experience
is the phase of recharging. We may experience it as the void, as the
loss of even self-awareness within a black and empty unconsciousness.
But it is just a time of settling, a necessary time to collect
ourselves, to rest, even if very briefly. Even if other parts of us
are busy with other notes in the symphony, this part of us is
recuperating and building up its strength in a quiet time, a time that
with due respect and love everyone needs in every moment, since it is
intrinsic and necessary to life. So this fourth phase is the Void.
There is a fifth phase. This is the good news of Hindu philosophy,
that I travelled around the world to learn and to bring home to you,
for which I spent seven years in Philadelphia getting a Ph.D. in
cognitive science, in order to be able to put it into modern terms for
you. After recharging and before starting up the next action, the
nervous system is in a state of readiness, of fullness to overflowing,
of power to create and form and enliven the experienced universe. It
is not yet doing anything, in the sense that the networks of nerves
have not yet begun discharging in patterns that we experience as
(representations of) sensed objects or inferred thoughts or uttered
words, but rather it is in a state of being prepared for whatever
comes, a state of capability, a state of inner power, a state of
freedom.
It is the state of Grace. It is not experienced as anything
in particular. It is not something our eyes can see or our mind can
represent (since seeing and representing are activities of nerve
networks in our brains whose patterns constitute sensation and
thought; and since this phase of Grace is not an activity but a
readiness to act). The very fact that in the following moment we
experience something new means that we must have been in this state.
It is the natural condition of what we are.
The fifth phase of Grace is after and before every experience, but it
is outside of what we are directly aware of. We can know that it is
there, and we can see its consequences. But if it can be perceived,
it is not our normal perception that can perceive it.
There is something better, something desireable, something lovely I
want to share with you. To me, Grace is experienced as a feeling of
freshness and inspiration in the heart. A surprising, undeserved
flame burning in the center of myself, which when I come to an
awareness of it, makes me feel wonder, amazement, gratitude, and
sometimes an overwhelming feeling of too much love and light for my
small and paltry mind to hold. This awareness is impossible to
consciously re-create, impossible to hold onto with my mind,
impossible to control, it is evanescent, mysterious, precious.
But there is a trick by which one can bring Grace under one's control.
The trick is to go into the void with your whole heart and self
feeling submission, humble devotion, heartfelt love. If I do that,
then Grace happens. Of course Grace happens anyway but the point is
to be aware of it. And that is the way. So before the word Grace, in
my mantra of the five-fold action, I say "Om", if I am doing the Hindu
version of it, or a heartfelt "Please" without attaching it to
anything, just to have the right attitude of humble submission and
loving devotion, which happens to bring about the awareness of Grace
in the next moment.
So the five phases of an experience are Arising, Sustaining, Self,
Void, and (with an attitude of humble devotion we can experience)
Grace.
I don't know about you, but I want to memorize, study and learn these
phases, and master the skill of being aware of their continual
cyclical flow. Most of all I want to experience Grace in my heart.
But also for the peace of mind offered by seeing that all these
aspects of experience are safe, normal, not scary, healthy, natural,
important parts of my own creation of my own experience, I want to
learn to recognize them quickly, to be able keep them in my mind as I
go through life so that I can begin to see what is happening as what
it really is, directly and immediately, just as one sees a red thing
and knows that it is red. For example, if I feel that settling inward
feeling of the Void I might otherwise get confused and worried that
I'm not engaged with life, or if I feel that something is causing me
pain, I can see it as part of Life, no more or less than anything
else, that will subside just as it arose, so that the pain is less
distressing. This is the balanced view I desire to have, seeing
things as they are in real time, as the score of my life's symphony
plays itself out. I believe that if I can do that then I will be able
to have a new, different, more insightful, happier, better
relationship to my experience and my life.
So how does one develop a straightforward skill like that? It's not
much different from learning any skill, it's just a matter of
memorization and application. So I have memorized a mantra comprising
names of the five phases, plus something that reminds me about humble
devotion, if I want to actually feel the Grace that is there.
I have used both English and Hindu versions of it with equal and
excellent effect.
In English I have called them Peace, Life, Self, Void, and (Please) Grace.
Peace because a new experience arises out of peace, or you might say,
out of its own absolute nonexistence. Life because the sustaining of
experience is what we experience as the actual content of life itself,
whether it is good, bad, or indifferent. Self, obviously, that's the
self-awareness phase. Void could just as well be "Settling down".
And Grace is preceded by Please, to get me in the right frame of
mind.
The Hindu version refers to Brahma, or the Absolute; Vishnu, the
Sustainer of the World; Shiva, the Inner Self; Krishna, whose name
means "black", which well describes the Void; Om, the Holy Syllable,
the first name of God, which is spoken with great reverence; and Guru,
which is the Grace-bestowing power.
In the Vijnana Bhairava (a.k.a. "Knowing God"), a scripture of Kashmir
Shaivism, the five phases are described as manifestation, relishing,
experiencing as Self, settling of the seed, and dissolution. This
section is a commentary on that verse.
The Buddhist, Christian, and Muslim versions use the traditional words
that I know of that are closest to the intended meaning, I don't know
good words for everything, however.
The Christian version uses Heaven as a symbol for the peace from which
life arises. Jesus is the name here for Life or Sustainer since Jesus
said "I am the way, the truth, and the life"(John 14:6). Some have
said that Yahweh means "I am"; and "I am" is simply the awareness of
the Self cast in the form of a sentence. "Holy" is a word that when
expressed with faith and sincere feeling puts the speaker in a state
of humble devotion. And "Spirit" here is used to refer to the
awareness of Grace. I don't know a good Christian term for the Void.
The Muslim version is very close to the phrase by which, by uttering
it, one becomes a Muslim:
The Buddhist version is somewhat obscure, in keeping with Buddhist
scholarly temperament. Samaadhi is the peace from which experience
arises. Samsara is the world (of suffering, typically) itself. Atman
is the self, but as the Buddha pointed out the impermanence of things,
implying that nothing has a true (permanent) self, I leave it as a
puzzle or koan whether to label the third, self-aware phase as Self
(atman) or to use that phase as an opportunity to deny the reality and
permanence of samsaara by, after experiencing the sustaining phase,
invoking the appellation, Anatman: non-self. Sunyataa, or emptiness,
is the quality of the Void, important in Buddhism's argument that
everything is ultimately empty. Sunya means empty, of course.
Finally, Om Mani recalls the great Buddhist mantra, Om-Mani-Padme-Hum,
Om-The Jewel-(in) The Lotus-I am. The Jewel is a metaphor for that
flame of Grace in the the heart.
I have done this mantra with my breath; breath in with Peace, out with
Life, in with Self, out with Void, in with Om, out with Grace.
Sometimes if I do it for a long time, only Self and Grace remain.
Which leads us to the next mantra, which my Hindu guru taught me as
So'ham.
1) In table tennis you need a coach if you want to be more than a
garage hacker, and there are many tricks of correct form that you have
to get right and that you probably won't figure out without someone
who knows giving you some personal feedback. So also in life.
2) If I do two things, three things happen, very consistently. First,
I stand perfectly straight (or sit), as if suspended by a string from
screw in the center of your head, or as if electrocuted, for example.
I mean, straight, and that includes the hips and the lower back not
being rolled butt-under. Second, I lean back about four degrees,
hardly at all, but just enough. Then: First, I suddenly don't care
about anything. Second, you know when you go to sleep it's as if
everything goes black; well here it's as if everything goes white.
It's not that it really goes white, but it's just as if it does.
Third, I have an positive feeling of euphoria. Anyway it works for
me. But it always works for me. So try it. Try it now. Are you
trying it yet? Try it now, and try it again later, and remember it.
It will help you.
3) The goal of pranayama, one of the phases of yoga, is evenness of
breath. The secret of what that means is that the inbreath should be
equal in duration with the outbreath. If you meditate with a focus on
evenness of the timing of the inbreath and the outbreath, you will
find that it makes a big change in your emotional perspective, and
life will seem easier and simpler and less crazy.
4) The way to get grace is to say please. That is, humble devotion is
the (only) path to an inner experience of freshness and inspiration in
the heart. That's the first part of the secret. The other part is
that you can indeed have grace.
With love,
Tom
In defense of introspection
1995-1998
A theory of mind and emptiness
What can the mind experience?
On feeling empty, growing up
On inspiration
Fall, 1995.
Footnote:
On Mantra
August 8, 1996
(Notes from a friend of some Hindus)
On the Nature and Meaning of Life
April 22, 2002
English:
Peace
Life
Self
Void
Please
Grace
Hindu:
Brahma
Vishnu
Shiva
Krishna
Om
Guru
Muslim:
Rabbil
Aalameen
Wa
Aslamtu
Mohammad
Buddhist:
Samaadhi
Samsaara
(an)atman
Sunya
Om
Mani
Christian:
Heaven
Jesus
Yahweh
Sin
Holy
Spirit
Our life is our world, so I use "aalameen", the world, to refer to the
sustaining of experience. If God isn't peace then I'm really missing
something, so I use "rabbil", "the Lord", to refer to Peace.
"Aslamtu", or "I submit", is a third form of the one Arabic word that
we know in English both as Islam (submission) and as Muslim (one who
submits). Mohammad, as the Prophet who bestows upon us the gift of
Islam (see, Mohammad knew the trick of humble devotion, don't think
otherwise), who has led those who submit to the presence of god, has
the place of honor as the symbol of grace. I have left the Void
empty.
Wa aslamtu li rabbil aalameen
I (I)submit to the Lord (of) the World
A Recipe: Exhortation, Mantra, Unity
August 8, 1996
1st person
be-verb
definite pronoun
be-verb
1st person
be-verb
definite pronoun
...
I
am
that
am
I
am
...
This
is
me
is
that
...
Four secrets
May 23, 2002